Games

There Is No Coming of Age in 'Oxenfree'

Oxenfree argues that age doesn’t necessarily bring wisdom and that growing older doesn’t necessarily make us more mature.


Oxenfree

Publisher: Night School Studio
Price: $20.00
Developer: Night School Studio
Release Date: 2016-01-14

Oxenfree is a Young Adult story about a girl named Alex, a group of her friends, and the supernatural entities they get involved with on a mysterious island. Like most mysterious islands, this one is an attractive hang out spot for teens looking to escape from their normal lives for a night, and what begins as a night of unsupervised drinking becomes something much more sinister and dangerous.

On its face, Oxenfree is a standard, though well-written, young adult coming-of-age story, the story of One Big Night that offers life lessons to its teenage characters. However, beneath that generic surface is a story that undercuts and deconstructs the very idea of coming of age, the idea that there’s this arbitrary line in a person’s emotional development in which we go from “child” to “adult”, from someone young enough that we should be taking advice to someone old enough that we should be giving advice. Oxenfree argues that there is no line, there is no coming of age.

There are several moments in the game in which we see our reflection in a mirror or in a lake, and our reflection gives us advice on our current supernatural situation. The advice seems like nonsense in the moment -- in my game, my reflection told me to tell Michael, my dead older brother, that he should stay in a relationship with Clarissa, the mean girl of our group. Besides the fact that Michael is dead, Clarissa is such an asshole that any decision that makes her happy seems to be the wrong decision.

However, a few supernatural time traveling shenanigans later, I’m in the past and talking with my soon-to-be-dead brother about his future. He asks about his relationship with Clarissa, and I’m given a choice in how to respond. In retrospect, it’s now clear that my reflection was speaking to me from the future. So do I say what my future-reflection advised, or do I reject her? Will rejecting that advice cause some sort of time paradox? Was my future self trying to change the past by telling me to do something different, or was she trying to keep the timeline intact?

There are a lot of questions raised in this moment that deal with the philosophical consequences of time travel, but at the core of this issue is something much simpler: Do I agree with that advice?

Oxenfree isn’t actually interested in those philosophical questions about time travel. That sci-fi plotting is just a means of digging into issues of identity and personal growth, specifically regarding teenagers.

As noted, Oxenfree is a coming-of-age story about a group of teens and the One Big Night that changes their lives forever. It’s the kind of story in which the main character usually ends up learning an important lesson about life, love, loss, friendship, family, or all of the above. Alex should, ostensibly, leave the island as a more mature woman. This trope and the degree to which Oxenfree plays into it is what tempts us to follow the advice of our future-reflection. She’s supposed to be us, but grown up just a little bit more.

However, the point of giving us a choice in this moment is that we’re meant to realize that we don’t have to agree. We can do something different. That’s why this isn’t just a cut scene. Do we do what we’re told, or do we forge our own path through this world? We’re meant to consider who we are and our relationship with others, relationships each player has developed organically based on dialogue choices, and to consider how those things might change or not change in the future, and then to make our own decision. The point of this moment (and the others like it throughout the game) is to realize that we don’t have to do what we’re told.

In any normal coming-of-age story this would be a moment of tragedy, a moment in which my youthful arrogance is exposed, setting me up to be eventually humbled when I come to better understand my fragile place in the world. But Oxenfree doesn’t judge us for breaking away from the supposedly correct timeline -- the game actually justifies it.

Behind the scenes, when our future-reflection gives us that advice, it’s either speaking based on the selection of someone on our Friends list, or the game is just selecting a response at random. Or we could even be selecting the advice ourselves. After all, the dialogue bubbles are always backwards, and in one case, upside down as well, so reading them is difficult. However, I’m certain that I hit a button by instinct and that became my future-reflection’s advice. The point is that we don’t really know where the information is coming from.

In the context of the narrative, we’re inclined to take this advice because it seems to be coming from someone in a position of authority, someone who knows more than we do. Yet, in reality, it’s either coming from my current present-self, the random guess of a computer, or from a friend. What seems like a confident statement is actually a rather poorly considered one. That’s not to say that it is bad advice, as one choice in particular can save a character’s life, but it is advice that is not coming from a place of knowledge or maturity. Our figure of authority is anything but.

On top of all this, when it comes time for us to do the time travel thing and actually become the reflection, now giving advice to our past selves, we get that same dialogue tree for a third time. Again, the important part of this being that one choice is that we can choose something different than we did before. We don’t have to follow what was said or done. We can change our mind about everything or nothing.

Did I only reluctantly follow my future-reflection’s advice? Then, here’s my chance to say what I really think that I should have done. Did I regretfully not follow the advice? Then, here’s my chance to repeat it, as if this emphasis will matter to my past self. The point here is that while we’re free to say what we want, we also know that it won’t actually matter one bit. Our past selves are still free to ignore or follow us as they see fit because we’re not the same person as our reflection in the mirror. This timeline is not a closed loop in which we’re fated to repeat ourselves. It is an open loop in which every option is always possible. Therefore, we can never truly know better than our past selves because we don’t know the life that they’ll lead, the choices that they’ll make.

Oxenfree undercuts the idea that we can ever truly come of age. Our future self is first presented as a kind of guide, but that guidance is based on guesswork and luck. We have many future selves, and each one would give different advice to our past selves, and each one would think that it is giving the best advice. When it comes time for us to speak to our past self, we’re not really speaking from a place of authority because we still don’t know how that original advice will play itself out. We’re just making what seems like the best decision in the moment.

Age doesn’t necessarily bring wisdom. Growing older doesn’t necessarily make us more mature. Going through hardship, whether normal or supernatural, doesn’t necessarily give us insight into how to avoid or endure similar hardship.

As a final kicker, the last line of dialogue in the game is also the first line of dialogue -- literally. The line is repeated to us as the screen fizzles out like an old VHS tape and time rewinds, and we find ourselves back at the beginning again, starting the night over. Time is not a closed loop, we’re free to explore every possibility in our relationships and personal growth, but there’s no definitive end to that growth. This is what coming of age looks like, argues Oxenfree. It is not a straight line of increasing maturity and wisdom, but a loop in which we repeat the confused, desperate, guesswork of childhood, over and over again.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image