To comp or not to comp for shows

Reading a headline like this probably won't elicit much sympathy from anyone other than a scribe: Black Crowes deny a journo a free ticket. It does bring up a few interesting issues though.

Some points worth pondering that were brought up in response to the article:

- Comps come out of band's pocket- some can afford this better than others: i.e. Jagger and friends will still have their villas if they miss sales from a ticket but a small town band playing at a 150 capacity club could probably use the money. Bands make their money more from ticket sales than album sales

- Journos can't always afford to pay for shows they write about (sometimes a ticket costs more than what they're paid)

- If performers or management deny comps for journalist, they shouldn't cry if they get no press for a concert date. If they get bad press as a result of sour grapes (and not revealing that the writer got shut out), then shame on that publication though

- I wonder if journos would appreciate or not appreciate shows more if they had to pay for each of them. To be honest, I really don't think I appreciate a concert any more than when I pay for a ticket. Maybe I'm a little madder when it isn't a good show and I have to pay for it though

- Some bands thrive on bad press or adversity with the press (i.e. Motley Crew, Grand Funk) so this might not even be an issue for them

- Arena acts are already so big that this isn't an issue for many of them. Remember recently when Prince offered press tickets but they still had to be bought at full price? Pretty nervy but the guy still did a great tour and raked in tons of money

- The opposite holds true for smaller acts- a written-in, accepted price to doing shows is that they need exposure so they have to let some of the sales be swallowed up by comps so that they can get a chance at recognition

- It'd be interesting to somehow take a poll at different shows to find out how many people were comped (as writers or otherwise) and how that might or might not effect how well a show went

- Believe it or not, there are actually some writers who take it as a given that they'll be comped. These are the top feeders who work for big national magazines. At a recent panel, I'll never forget a writer who was asked about what he paid for a certain concert who then angrily snapped back "I never pay for shows!" like it was his God-given right or something

- I think that some writers can make a reasonable argument that since their columns promote bands and gets them recognition, that kind of makes up for the price of the comp

- Just as there's a food chain for bands, there's one for writers also so that certain scribes who write for large circulation publications can be pretty much assured comps to a show while other writers who write for smaller publications have to sometimes get turned down. The publicist/label/band can reasonably say, "we can't give away all our tickets"

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.