Peripatetic Postcards

Travel Light

I think I see the light

coming to me, coming through me

giving me a second sight . . .

So shine shine shine

Shine shine shine

shine shine shine

"I Think I See the LIght", Cat Stevens

Those who make it a living to co-exist with me may be surprised to hear this (since it is a rather well-kept secret), but as a rule, I am a rule-governed machine. Although officially I do not abide by people and structures and situations of control, when it comes to the peripatetic act, I adhere to – nay embrace – nostrums and dictums and aphorisms and folk wisdom and humble rules of thumb.

You have read a few in this blogspace over the years, perhaps; things like: “making do” or “listening to the sounds between the notes” or “reading the signs” or “any picture tells multiple stories”. All good bits of advice to keep in mind as one traverses the world's many nodes and paths.

And now here’s another one for you all (the walrus was Paul -- no, just kidding -- here goes, for real):

“when traveling, travel light”.

Well, since you took the trouble to ask, here are a few tips.

This is a rule of peripatetic thumb that I find exceedingly tough to adhere to -- no matter how many times I pack a suitcase. You would think that there could be fewer things simpler than "seven days and eight nights". But I guess there are. Compared with that calculus, 2x - 3y = N2 / 4 would have a better chance of achieving a successful solution (and I flunked linear equations!). Because, confronted with a simple week overseas, damned if I can't avoid having to pack something on the order of:

  • 9 pairs of socks

  • 11 pair of underwear

  • 4 shorts

  • 3 pair of slacks

  • 2 dress coats

  • 3 dress shirts

  • 6 casual shirts

  • 5 ties

  • a sweater

  • at least one set of work-out gear

  • running shoes

  • sandals and/or knock-around slips ons

  • dress shoes, and

  • a huge bag of toiletries, containing:

    • sundry medications (heartburn, constipation, diahrrea, headache, itchy toesies . . . etcetera and so forth)

    • vitamins (C and Multi-)

    • deodorant

    • shaving gear

    • cologne

    • toothbrush and toothpaste

    • hairbrush, and

    • the kitchen sink

Which, if you have trouble doing the arithmetic, adds up to excessive amounts of cubic centimeters requiring luggage occupancy that simply exceeds the capability for one human to comfortably lug to and through some foreign city.

Fortunately for my ego, this does not appear to be exclusively a personal problem. As I wend my way through airports, my detective's nose for induction informs me that just to the left, then over there on the right, and even directly dead center, there are a bevy of other folk who share my affliction. So many folk as to render the following images a not uncommon scene at your average pre-flight zone:


Desperate people digging deep into their luggage, extracting hefty objects to transfer into an empty cardboard box or a spacious bag purchased in an adjacent bric-a-brac store for 250 yen; shifting matter from one suitcase to another like they have been suddenly confronted with some life and death pop water quiz out of Die Hard with a Vengeance; finalizing their Herculean mental tasks, they gingerly plop the modified bags onto check-in counter scales in moods alternating between exasperation and resignation, praying that this time the ascending L.E.D. will finally confirm that they've made weight.

"Why so much sweat shed?" you might ask.

Because failing to make weight means excess baggage charges. Occasionally the banning of the bag, entirely . . .

"Well, where exactly am I going to send this bag? I've just vacated my apartment, I've quit my job -- I've got no office or home address. All my friends in this country are standing in line with me, tickets in hand! So, who am I going to leave this suitcase with???!"

"Too bad, pal," you can see the counter person ready to p(ron)ounce . . . "that is not my business. Not my problem. You should have looked up how many kilograms we accept before you started loading up the silverware. It's written right there on our web site."

So, to avoid the fiasco of paying the fine (not to mention the embarrassment of exposing the contents of your suitcase [the shade of your panties, the lethargy in your packing style, the foodstuffs you intend to keep you company during your private hours abroad] for the greater public to see as you frenetically seek to make weight), you'd be better served to travel light.

But how?

Well, since you took the trouble to ask . . . here are a few tips:

Traveling light, pure and simple, means avoiding over-sized bags . . . the greater the space, the greater the temptation to fill it. A prescription for disaster, on the one hand; on the other, a sort of mathematical theorum I can offer you free of charge.

Instead of being thankful I can hear you saying "well, duh."

Okay (you ingrate) sure, go ahead and laugh. Ridicule -- even taunt me, if you must -- but, as you do, try pulling out a bag the size of the ones below and you try to avoid exceeding the limit.

Okay, so you still find that advice a bit too rudimentary for your advanced faculties. Then answer me this: how will you avoid overstuffing a bag if you are going to be gone for a week or more? A mix of business and pleasure, say, in a climate warm during the day and mild-to-cool at night? Well, that's a toughy, right? And one without any easy answer. So, let's put that puzzle (which is sure to leave us prone on the airport tile) aside, while I tell you, instead, about the folks I know who manage to travel with only a set or two of clothes. They wear 'em in the day, wash 'em at night. Hope that radiant body heat will prove an effective drier in the aftermath. (And pray that there won't be too much rain, sleet, or snow in the in-between times).

So, that is one way to go. Another is to travel with nothing but the clothes on your back, buy what you need in the place that you are going to, and then leave it all behind. A material rebuttal, I guess, on the sentiment expressed by U2 in "Walk On":

The only baggage you can bring / is all that you can't leave behind.

In this way, taking the U2 lead, we might allow ourselves to move beyond the practicalities. Doing so, "traveling light" can morph into a philosophy to govern the sojourn. A set of dos and don'ts that cautions us to:

  1. eschew the strung-out queues . . .

  2. eat the fluffy fare; and steer clear of the greasy stuffed skins . . .

  3. keep abreast of the time in your ever-changing zones, and

  4. press through space with nothing more than you can carry in your hands or pull along behind you . . .

It may not be much, but a la Kundera, this is (and has only aspired to be) a philosophy about lightness, after all.

A slight trifle, a brief dalliance, a smidgen of reason, to help you cats see the light.

(Shine, shine, shine . . . )

To help you pick your way through, and maintain your balance along, whatever treacherous treks are to come.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.