PM Pick

When a kiss is not just a kiss.

Stephen Tropiano

What's different from the kisses that take place between these three couples versus the highly publicized same-sex kisses in the 1990s . . . is the two people kissing now are very much in love.

There's a memorable scene in the 1987 Stephen Frears' film, Sammie and Rosie Get Laid in which the bohemian, Rosie (Frances Barber), explains the politics of kissing to her uptight, reactionary father-in-law. To illustrate how two kisses can differ in terms of their social and political meaning, she kisses her husband softly on the lips and then engages in a passionate kiss with a total stranger (played by Fine Young Cannibal's Roland Gift). Rosie's point is clear: not all kisses are alike. A kiss is not necessarily just a kiss.

Over the years, television has repeatedly made the same point by treating a kiss exchanged between two members of the same sex as something out-of-the-ordinary and unnatural. It's the network brass more than television series writers and producers who have reinforced society's negative attitudes toward public displays of affection between gay and lesbian couples by treating same-sex kissing as a taboo subject.

When prime time series first began featuring same sex kisses (mostly between women) in the early 1990s, the networks were wary of offending their audience, which can potentially translate into a loss of revenue if your advertisers choose to pull their commercials. At the same time, controversy can also fuel viewer interest, and so the networks have never shied away from free publicity if they can get more viewers to tune in. Just to assure America they are being responsible about monitoring their programming, networks are always quick to slap on a warning about the episode's "mature themes" which may not be suitable for a young audience.

A prime example of network hypocrisy is CBS's response to a 1993 episode of Picket Fences entitled "Sugar and Spice", which featured a kiss between two curious teenage girls. Before agreeing to air the episode, CBS insisted writer/producer David Kelly re-shoot the scene in the dark. In her exclusive report on the episode, Entertainment Tonight's Mary Hart invited viewers to compare the retake with the original and judge the suitability of the controversial scene for themselves. Of course, it is CBS, which released the excised footage, that benefits from the story. Hart's story paints CBS as being responsible and gives the series, which never scored high ratings, some much-needed free publicity. More importantly, the Entertainment Tonight report alters the socio-political meaning of the kiss by showing the moment out of the context of its storyline and turning it in a spectacle for the audience to judge.

Fortunately, some of the major commercial networks have loosened up when it comes to same-sex kissing. Surprisingly, the majority of kisses featured on episodes of Dawson's Creek, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Once and Again have involved younger characters, yet with none of the hoopla surrounding the Picket Fences episode. In the final episode of Once and Again, Jesse (Evan Rachel Wood) gives in to her attraction to her high school friend Katie (Mischa Singer). Their kiss received no media attention, but perhaps it may have been due to the fact the series had been cancelled before airing. Buffy's Willow (Alyson Hannigan) was repeatedly seen kissing her now deceased lover Tara (Amber Benson) in matter-of-fact manner, just like real lovers do.

On the final episode of Dawson's Creek, which jumped five years into the future, Jack McPhee (Kerr Smith) is back in Capeside teaching English (as an openly gay teacher) and involved in a serious relationship with Pacey's brother Doug (Dylan Neal), the town's closeted sheriff (speculation about Doug's sexual orientation dates back to the show's first season). In their final scene together, Doug realizes he needs to come out in order for he and Jack to be together. When the two men kiss on the beach, Jack tells the elderly couple passing by "I'm just kissing my boyfriend!" "That's nice," the woman responds.

What's different from the kisses that take place between these three couples versus the highly publicized same-sex kisses in the 1990s in episodes of L.A. Law (C.J. an Abby), Roseanne Roseanne and Sharon (Mariel Hemingway), and Party of Five (Julia (Neve Campbell) and Perry (Olivia D'Abo) is the two people kissing now are very much in love. Progress in terms of more honest representation of our lives can only happen when such a moment is an integral part of a storyline (as to being positioned as the "big moment") and, more importantly, we begin to see more stories with gay and lesbian characters that are truly in love.

Will & Grace addressed this issue in a self-reflexive episode in which Will (Eric McCormack) and Jack (Sean Hayes) launch a protest against NBC editing an on-screen kiss between two characters on their favorite sitcom, Along Came You. The storyline is no doubt a response to the show's detractors who complain about the two gay characters' lack of a romantic life. As Jack explains, by not showing the kiss, "They are saying the way I live my life is offensive."

When NBC responded with a "no comment", Jack and Will decide to make a public statement and kiss on-camera during a broadcast of Today. While I appreciate the fact that NBC can take a joke (Saturday Night Live has been biting the hand that feeds it for years), in this case the ending misses the mark intended on driving home Jack's original point. Jack's on-screen kiss with Will falls short because it is not a display of love, but a mere display for a group of cheering onlookers.

In perhaps what could be a step in the right direction, daytime television has at last included the first on-screen kiss between a same-sex couple. On April 22, 2003, All My Children's Bianca Montgomery (Eden Riegel) poured her heart out to Lena Kundera (Olga Sosnovska) who was about to leave town. The tearful scene ended with a kiss that was hot enough to convince Lena to stay in Pine Valley. What poor Bianca does not know is that the bisexual Lena was at first only using her to help the devious Michael, who is blackmailing her, to destroy Bianca's mother, Erica Kane, and her cosmetics company. Lena made the mistake of falling in love with Bianca and three weeks after that kiss, she finally came clean.

For All My Children fans, the kiss was long overdue, considering that her first potential love interest, Frankie Stone (Elizabeth Hendrickson) was murdered. The possibility that some of the on-screen chemistry between Eden and Hendrickson could be reignited when the latter returned to the series was squelched when we discovered Maggie is heterosexual.

However, an extensive campaign was launched by a group of devoted fans calling themselves BAMFans (Bianca and Maggie). According to their website, BAMFan members who self-identify as a diverse group of all ages, economic, and cultural backgrounds, and sexual orientations "want to ensure the story — the romance of Bianca Montgomery and Maggie Stone — is brought to the forefront of AMC." (American Movie Classics) I'm not sure of BAM's position on Bianca and Lena (will they change their name to BAL?), but I would hope they are happy that Bianca is getting on with her life. Even if Lena's original intentions were less than honorable, at least in the end she told Bianca the truth.

The kiss between Bianca and Lena did receive some media attention in TV Guide, Soap Opera Digest, and other publications. On the day before the kiss aired, Riegel and Sosnovska appeared on another ABC program, The View and fielded questions from Barbara Walters and company (including guest host Monica Lewinsky!). Starr Jones introduced the segment by stating that AMC has dealt with a number of controversial topics including "AIDS, abortion, drug abuse, racial prejudice, and teenage alcoholism, but no storyline has generated the kind of buzz as the lesbian kiss."

The kiss is shown (even though its context within the scene is never fully explained), followed by the questions you would expect from the ladies of The View (i.e., Were you nervous?). Playing a lesbian on television for over two years, Riegel has no trouble fielding their inane questions, though you can't help thinking both she and Sosnovska are wondering what the fuss is really all about.

What I kept wondering during all of this is now that they have kissed, will they get to second base? Will they ever kiss again? Or do anything else? Probably not — at least not until society (or at least, television) begins to regard a same-sex kiss as just a kiss.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.