The Truth About Charlie (2002)

Cynthia Fuchs

It conjures a perverse and giddy grace.

The Truth About Charlie

Director: Jonathan Demme
Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Thandie Newton, Stephen Dillane, Lisa Gay Hamilton, Joon-Hoon Park, Ted Levine, Christine Boisson, Charles Aznavour, Agnès Varda, Tim Robbins, Anna Karina, Magali Noël
MPAA rating: PG-13
Studio: Universal Pictures
First date: 2002
US Release Date: 2002-10-25

One truth about Charlie is that he's dead within the first few minutes of Jonathan Demme's remake of Stanley Donen's unremake-able Charade. That's too bad, because he's played by Stephen Dillane, with a lively if vaguely derelict charm, conveyed in a fleeting post-sex, pre-death scene and a few uncanny-looking flashback shots, as when he stands in the wreckage of his Parisian apartment, sort of smiling like he has a secret.

As much as these intriguing moments make you wish Charlie had a larger role in the film named for him, you're pushed to considerably further to desire same when you realize that his more-or-less replacement, the designated romantic lead, the one who takes Dillane's place alongside lovely Thandie Newton (who plays Charlie's estranged wife of 3 months, Regina) is Marky Mark. And I don't even mean to dis him: he's more than proved he can sort out challenging roles (Boogie Nights comes to mind, as well as 3 Kings, or even James Mangold's Fear, where he was perfectly matched with William Petersen), but these are exceptions. More often than not, Wahlberg is a stolid sort.

And besides, he and Newton don't exactly spark.

Regina first espies Whalberg's Joshua Peters when she thinks Charlie is still alive (though you've already gotten the idea that he's not in that cursory train scene). Sunning herself while on vacation, she's suddenly caught in Joshua's shadow. He stands over her for some seconds, lingering just long enough to make her (and you) remember him. This, coupled with her bit of dialogue concerning her decision to divorce Charlie leads to no-surprise when he turns up at De Gaulle, and offers to take her home in his cab, all sweetness and flirtatiousness, whereupon she enters her apartment to find it trashed and essentially emptied. Enter the cops, who inform her that Charlie had multiple identities/passports, and was not an art dealer as he told her. She also learns that he stole with killed over $6 million in missing diamonds, ransom for a political prisoner in Sarajevo.

Several desperate types make it their business to get the diamonds, not much caring that Regina doesn't know where it might be. She's also unsure of the identities of her pursuers, including the increasingly friendly Joshua and his cronies, Il-Sang (Joong Hoon Park), Emil (Ted Levine), and Lola (Lisa Gay Hamilton, like Newton, a veteran of Demme's Beloved). Regina also takes a meeting with one Mr. Bartholomew (Tim Robbins), a U.S. government official who insists she keep her contact with him a secret, which makes her encounters with the nosy cronies more and more awkward -- they want info, she wants to keep her promise to the mysterious Mr. Bartholomew; perhaps this is because he tells her that she's "a decent person," apparently quite the compliment among this crowd of paramilitary types and con artists.

Regina, meanwhile, doesn't piece much together, except that her inclination to trust Joshua is probably not such a good idea. She comes to this conclusion when Emil calls her with a cryptic warning about her guest for the evening, Joshua. You get it a minute or so earlier, when Joshua seduces her by playing a Charles Aznavour cd and the man himself appears, first as his old self in Truffaut's Shoot the Piano Player, then as his current self, on the balcony to sing "Quand Tu M'Aimes" while Joshua draws Regina to him, on the other side of the window. It's a little too adorable and nostalgic, and just odd enough to demonstrate Demme's real project here -- thanking France for producing the Nouvelle Vague. (Such gratitude and appreciation are underlined with cameo appearances by Anna Karina (as a tango instructor named Karina), Magali Noël (as a baleful woman in black), and Agnès Varda (as the Widow Hyppolite).

Joyous as these bits of homage are, they also usefully suggest a theme, having to do with trust and betrayal and the fun to be found in their romantic-comedic collisions. Intellectual and gorgeous, cool, and passionate, New Wave movies embraced all kinds of seeming opposites, but above all, they brought together form and content, sometimes violently, sometimes brilliantly, always provocatively. The Truth About Charlie does that too, and in doing so, marks the director's return to gossamer verve, following his weighty Hollywood prize-winners like Philadelphia and Silence of the Lambs. It's not so balls-out fearless as Something Wild, but conjures a perverse and giddy grace.

That's not to say that the film doesn't have problems: the plot is nonsense, Mr. Bartholomew is mostly a drag (too imperious to be baffling, too predictable to be threatening), and the speedy dispatching of the cronies en route to the leads' climactic clinch is annoying (aside from a pre-climactic clinch between Regina and Lola, which stops the action in a way that is strangely moving). But the action per se is less important than the look of it, and cinematographer Tak Fujimoto's straight-up love for Technicolor and handheld gallivanting around Paris surely comes through: the flea market at Cligancourt is gritty and poetic, the Hotel Langlois (named for the founder of the Cinematheque Francaise) features a terrific cage-style elevator, and streets are bopping with visual commotion.

This visual styling sustains Demme's deft retooling of the original (which can never be revisited exactly -- so you let it go). If the primary reason for casting Newton is, as everyone's been saying, to evoke Audrey Hepburn (who played Regina in 1963), fine. But she brings her own exquisite energy, and if it's lost on Wahlberg, it's certainly appreciated by the black-gloved Commandant Dominique (Christine Boisson). Theirs is a most intriguing, playfully gender-fucking relationship, with Regina alternately sharp and soft, and Dominique edgy and tough (and sleeping with the detective who is her partner or underling: hard to say which). Because she's a cop with a job to do (investigating the missing diamonds and the murder -- with several trips to the morgue featuring corpse-eye view shots of those live people peering at the dead), Dominique tends to stay focused. But she also makes no secret of her attraction to and respect for Regina. Together they develop a bond based in frank audacity, naïve and shrewd, boyish and girlish.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.