The Who: Who's Next [Deluxe Edition]

Adam Williams

Few albums in the pantheon of classic rock recordings embody the greatness of an artist more than 1971's Who's Next.

The Who

Who's Next [Deluxe Edition]

Label: MCA
US Release Date: 2003-03-25
UK Release Date: 2003-04-14

Few albums in the pantheon of classic rock recordings embody the greatness of an artist more than 1971's Who's Next. Arguably the Who's finest effort, the album came at a time when the group was at its creative peak. Fresh off the monumental success of the rock opera Tommy in 1969, the band had ridden a wave of critical acclaim for the album and subsequent live performances of its material, highlighted by memorable gigs at the Metropolitan Opera House, Woodstock, and the Isle of Wight. The scope of Tommy had drawn attention to Pete Townshend's emerging genius as a songwriter, and in the process set a standard that he would be measured by throughout the Who's illustrious career. The viability of Tommy as a recorded and live vehicle had given Townshend renewed confidence in his own abilities, and had motivated him to take on larger challenges. His primary focus post Tommy came in the form of the Lifehouse project, a grandiose look at the possibilities of music in a futuristic setting.

Townshend's idealized views on rock and roll as an element of one's being, laid the groundwork for an elaborately sophisticated creation consisting of a feature film, expansive album, and interactive live concerts. While plausible to Townshend, the intricate blueprint for musical salvation proved to be a logistical impossibility, and the project gradually unraveled into disarray. In spite of its failure to reach fruition, the Lifehouse project yielded enough quality recorded material to assemble the nine-song album Who's Next. At the time, no one could have foreseen the magnitude of this release, particularly Townshend himself who had viewed it as a commercial compromise of his Lifehouse vision.

Despite Townshend's initial misgivings, the magnitude ofWho's Next is undeniable. The scope of its grandeur is evidenced by every track having become an FM radio staple, with much of the album's material incorporated into the Who's long standing concert set list. While each song is memorable in its own right, most notable are "Won't Get Fooled Again", which has reached rock anthem status, and the John Entwistle penned "My Wife" that proudly displays the bassist's skills as a songwriter. Simply put, it is as close to perfect an album as could be imagined. How then could a recording of this stature be improved upon? Read on.

MCA has given Who aficionados an early Christmas present with the release of Who's Next Deluxe Edition. The original album has been coupled with added songs, and a complete second disc has been included featuring a live Lifehouse performance at London's Young Vic Theater. Altogether, the twin CD set provides 29 tracks totaling two and a half hours of vintage Who material. Additionally, an updated Townshend essay describing the Lifehouse project is featured, as well as extensive liner notes that shed light on the history of the album's recording processes.

Disc one is comprised of 15 tracks; Who's Next in its entirety, and six newly remastered recordings from early studio sessions that did not make the final album cut. Alternate versions of "Getting in Tune", "Love Ain't for Keeping", and "Behind Blue Eyes" give listeners slightly different looks at the material, while the original recorded version of "Pure and Easy" showcases the song's melodic beauty. The inclusion of an extended Motown cover of "Baby Don't You Do It" harkens back to the group's early club days and provides an interesting counterbalance to the album's more readily recognized tracks. The most fascinating of the additional material comes by way of a previously unreleased alternate version of "Won't Get Fooled Again". This take utilizes a different synthesizer track than the traditional version and is missing Daltrey's trademark scream. Overall, the six additional listings supply a welcome compliment to the album's original nine songs.

Disc two offers remixed versions of 14 songs performed at the Young Vic during the Spring of 1971. Taking place at roughly the same time as gigs at Leeds and the Isle of Wight, this Lifehouse concert maintains the distinctive live sound from the period, and includes much of the same material from those shows. It also provides evidence of the Who's ability to flawlessly transition brilliant studio material to the stage. Featured tracks from Who's Next include "Love Ain't for Keeping", "Behind Blue Eyes", "Getting in Tune", "Bargain", and "Won't Get Fooled Again". Fiery covers of "Young Man Blues" and "Road Runner" are included in the set, as are somewhat lesser played, but no less potent renditions of "Pure and Easy", "I Don't Even Know Myself", "Too Much of Anything", and "Time Is Passing". Also in the set is an outstanding trio of concert mainstays "Water", "My Generation", and "Naked Eye". Throughout the performance, Daltrey's vocals are strong and gritty, Moon's drumming is sharp, Entwistle lays down his usual virtuoso thunder, and Townshend's guitar playing is flawless.

The Deluxe Edition of Who's Next is noteworthy for two reasons. First, in an age of rampant re-releases and often sub par offerings, MCA has deviated from the curve and put together an exemplary package of material for Who fans. The sound quality on both CD's is excellent, while the booklet included is informative and enlightening. Second, the creative dynamic that went into the aborted Lifehouse project can be more fully appreciated as a greater amount of original material is made available. Townshend's musical vision may have been ahead of its time, but three decades later his songs still resonate with power and passion. For the most part, Who's Next rose like a Phoenix from the ashes of Lifehouse, catching lightning in a bottle as the group was at its pinnacle of greatness. Now, the album returns to much of its original conceptualized splendor, making it even better.

Long live rock.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.