Yeah Yeah Yeahs

Christine Di Bella
Yeah Yeah Yeahs

Yeah Yeah Yeahs

City: Detroit, Michigan
Venue: Magic Stick
Date: 2002-10-24
America's two most-slobbered-over-by-the-British-music-press rock locales met once again last Thursday when New York garage rockers the Yeahs Yeah Yeahs made their first appearance in Detroit as part of a mini co-headlining tour with city mates the Liars. The Yeah Yeahs Yeahs had been advertised as the main event here, but instead they played in the penultimate position of a four-band bill, leaving the too-late-for-a-school-night headlining slot to the Liars. This ultimately proved to be a smart move for the band, because it left the audience wanting more when their set ended a little before midnight, rather than heading early for the exits, worn out from too many hours of two-and-a-half-minute garage rock number upon two-and-a-half-minute garage rock number. Most reviews of the Yeah Yeah Yeahs zone in on frontwoman Karen O and her wild on-record/onstage antics, and, based on this night's performance, it's easy to see why. With guitarist Nick Zinner and drummer Brian Chase already in position playing the stop-start riff to "Shake It" to open the set, Karen O delayed her entrance another minute, then arrived onstage in fits and starts, conjuring up visions of some sort of art school version of "Here Comes the Bride". From then on, the audience's focus was almost exclusively on her -- what she was wearing (tight jeans and an nude color open-backed top with a black bra underneath that required constant adjustment), what she was drinking (a Corona, which she guzzled feverishly between songs), what her hair looked like (Chrissie Hynde with a mullet), and what she was doing (generally blowing everyone away). Heck, I thought the guys behind me exclaiming ad nauseum about how hot she was were going to explode from the sexual excitement. They were right to be excited. Karen O's audacious herky-jerky movements and breathless half-purring, half-screeching vocals, backed perfectly by the dirty thrash of her bandmates' guitar and drum assault, at times made for one of the most exciting live shows I've witnessed in awhile. That she maintained a broad smile rather than a sneer while intoning cutting lyrics like "As a fuck, son, you suck" -- apparently O never got the memo that rock stars don't smile -- made her enthusiasm all the more infectious. The audience obviously came prepared for a spectacle. More people had cameras on them than I've ever seen at a club show, and the flash bulbs were a constant accompaniment throughout the performance. Not to be out-objectified, Zinner also came prepared, pulling out a camera of his own at one point and taking snaps of the audience right back. The band performed nearly all of their recorded output (admittedly not that difficult a task when said output is composed of an EP, a three-song single and a few compilation tracks), along with a number of songs that will appear on their forthcoming album (label and release date as yet undetermined). The first half of the set, incredibly tight and nearly stage banter-free, flew by at a breakneck pace. It was only when things slowed down midway through so that the increasingly winded O could catch her breath that a few chinks in the armor could be detected. One intriguing aspect of the show was the total disconnect between Karen O's performing personality and her between-songs behavior. During the songs she was pure rock goddess, strutting and preening like the bastard love child of Mick Jagger and Debbie Harry. But between songs, especially later in the set, when forced to buy time and air by manufacturing crowd banter, she sounded girly and nervous, more Polly Pushypins than Polly Jean Harvey. It was endearing, but weirdly disappointing too, to catch glimpses of the unsure-of-herself woman behind the sex kitten curtain. Usually you'd have to wait much longer than 25 minutes to catch such a consummate performer without her face on. Also interesting was just how directly the show's excitement was tied to how close you were to the stage. When I slipped away from the front rows for a few numbers to see how the Yeahs' act played at the back of the house, the effect was very different. Without the visceral experience that close proximity to the band provided, the vocal histrionics and eardrum-puncturing musical accompaniment came off more often as noise and artifice rather than exhilaration. So though they're poised to be The Next Big Thing, it may well be better for the Yeah Yeah Yeahs to stay relatively small a little while longer. At least right now, they seem to be best in an intimate setting, where bodies are wedged together, the three-piece band's sound is capable of overpowering the room's dimensions, and every audience member can stand close enough to be pelted with drops of Karen O's sweat. The show closed with the anthemic "Our Time" and an awkward attempt to enlist audience members to take over on the lyrics, arena-rock style. Unfortunately, the folks into whose faces Karen O shoved the microphone didn't actually know the words (though not before they gave it a painfully labored try). Maybe it was just as well that the Yeah Yeah Yeahs got this reminder that they haven't quite reached audience singalong status yet, at least not in these parts where we've got our own British-press-proclaimed Next Big Things to obsess over. But it seems only a matter of time before they will, and here's hoping that when that time comes they're ready for it.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.