TV

Heroes: Season Three Premiere

The real excitement of the new season of Heroes is its promise to expand the series' assortment of baddies: their unabashed queerness and freakery make for more fun.

Heroes

Airtime: Mondays, 9pm ET
Cast: Hayden Panettiere, Jack Coleman, Sendhil Ramamurthy, Masi Oka, James Kyson Lee, Milo Ventimiglia, Greg Grunberg, Ali Larter, Adrian Pasdar
MPAA rating: N/A
Subtitle: Season Three Premiere
Network: NBC
US release date: 2008-09-22
Website
Trailer
Amazon

In the opening scene of Heroes' third season premiere, Peter (Milo Ventimiglia) tells Claire (Hayden Panettiere), "It wouldn't be like this if they'd never known about us." It's a little bit of cheek, of course, thinly referring to public "scandals" over the romance between the two actors that began before Panettiere turned 18. Following Peter's line, one wonders if they wish they'd stayed in the closet.

That line also refers back to last season's finale and forward to this season's interest in coming-out narratives and the effects of public disclosure. The end of last season saw Congressman Nathan Petrelli (Adrian Pasdar) shot at a press conference he called to come out to the nation and the world about his and other queers' secret powers. This raised the question that jumpstarts the new episode: who is so invested in keeping these genetic freaks closeted that she would want to assassinate Nathan?

Coming out is always fraught and can have unexpected consequences. Peter and Claire's exchange (which takes place "four years in the future") suggests these do-gooders have changed dramatically since their own self-disclosures. His facial scar and her now-chestnut hair, their dark clothes and toughened demeanors, make these shifts visible in possibly conventional ways: have Peter and Claire become two of the titular subjects of "Chapter 3," that is, "Villains"? Claire has long wanted to be "normal" even as she also wants to be recognized in and for her extraordinary difference. Either option -- whether she stays in or comes out -- carries dangers and rewards that Claire must consider, consciously or not, every day.

As the third season begins -- with a two-part new episode (only the first hour of which is reviewed here) -- Claire's fellow heroes are struggling with similar quandaries. After the death of his father (George Takei), Hiro (Masi Oka) has been installed as CEO of the global family-business, Yamagato Industries. He is also tasked with a "sacred duty," which is to act as a "sentinel" to safeguard a family secret that could destroy the world. Hiro proclaims that he doesn't want to be a sentinel, but rather a hero. Sentinels, apparently, are too below-the-radar, too reactive rather than proactive, and they don't get the public glory. Hiro chooses the splashier publicity of the active hero, and the consequences of his actions are immediate and possibly apocalyptic.

Similarly inclined to self-exposure, Mohinder (Sendhil Ramamurthy) finally owns up to his own repressed desires in relation to the genetic mutations he has spent his adult life studying. Prompted by Maya (Dania Ramirez) to continue his work to find a cure for her power (or "curse," as she calls it), Mohinder comes clean about why he's been dragging his feet. He's more interested in the possibility of creating mutation through medicine than in curing it, largely because of his own feelings of insignificance in comparison to the powerful freaks he runs with.

While the heroes struggle with these choices and consequences, the villains are comparatively steadfast in their desires. Sylar (Zachary Quinto), after some self-doubt last season, returns in all his bad-ass glory. Mr. Linderman (Malcolm McDowell), despite the opacity of his end goals, remains assured of his evil righteousness. In their certitude, the villains are more compelling than their wishy-washy heroic counterparts. The real excitement of "Villains" is its promise to expand the series' assortment of baddies: their unabashed queerness and freakery make for more fun.

7

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image