L'Auberge Espagnole (2002)

Cynthia Fuchs

Celebrates rather than laments the loss of fixed identities.

L'Auberge espagnole

Director: #233;dric Klapisch
Display Artist: Cédric Klapisch
MPAA rating: R
Studio: Fox Searchlight Pictures
Cast: Romain Duris, Cécile De France, Judith Godrèche, Kelly Reilly, Xavier De Guillebon, Kevin Bishop, Audrey Tautou
First date: 2002
US Release Date: 2003-05-16 (Limited release)

Xavier (Romain Duris) is headed for a business career, courtesy of his absent father's connections. Envisions his future, he's feeling just a little intimidated and anxious. Elevators, desks, suits. It all looks a little dreary.

To postpone what seems inevitable, Xavier takes a risk, leaving Paris, his "hippie" mother (her affection for tofu annoys Xavier), and his adorable girlfriend Martine (Audrey Tautou) for a year in Barcelona, via the university exchange program Erasmus. At the airport, Martine weeps, missing him before he even begins to walk away. He plays the man, reassuring her that all will be well, that they'll be back together soon. And then, as he heads to the plane, alone in the walkway, Xavier appears in mobile close-up, tears welling in his eyes. Perhaps this boy has something going for him besides a sweet face and a sometimes pained self-consciousness.

As Xavier narrates his story in Cédric Klapisch's L'Auberge Espagnole, he reveals that, like many 24-year-olds, he has a jumble of ideas in his head. Some are mundane (how to please his girlfriend, how to escape his mother); others are, indicated by speedy time-lapsing (denoting traffic, crowds, bureaucracy), simultaneous-action split screens, and a clever tendency to make literal (or very visible) emotional responses (a pile-on of forms he needs to fill out for the excursion cutely crowds characters out of the frame). Still, he's never too sure of himself, rather imagining that his year studying economics at the University of Barcelona will lead him to a revelation, a reason for his resistance to the life he's not quite chosen.

The moment he exits the plane in Spain, Xavier meets a French neurologist Jean-Michel (Xavier de Guillobon) who's working at the hospital in town; because the film is premised on things working out, the doctor and his beautiful but exceptionally dim wife (Judith Godrèche) invite him to stay with them while he looks for a place to live. Each morning he wakes on the couch, his face poofy as he agrees to whatever Jean-Michel asks him to do, mostly look after Anne-Sophie who hasn't yet picked up the language and is a afraid to leave the apartment. While this arrangement means decent food and a partner for exploring the spectacular Gaudí pavilions, Xavier knows he must find a bedroom of his own, and so, he answers an ad looking for a roommate.

This turn of events provides the place and circumstance that grants the film its title (in one meaning, it becomes "Europudding," in another, "free-for-all"). Before you can say The Real World, Xavier's been accepted by six multi-national roomies -- Italian Allessandro (Federico D'Anna), Danish Lars (Christian Pagh), German Tobias (Barnaby Metschurat), Soledad (Cristina Brondo), and British Wendy (Kelly Reilly). In this cluttered, haphazard space, where much of the film's action occurs, he finds a sense of himself in relation to others, in particular others who are not Martine (their early, swoony phone calls grant the roommates endless ammunition for good-natured ridicule: "Je t'aime, mon amour!"). As it turns out, the thing that Xavier liked best about her was her tendency to reflect him, to make him look and feel good.

So, Xavier is a selfish boy. This makes him more ordinary than anything else, a product of his time and place, as well as his station. He will come to understand himself in another context, to appreciate that his desires are not all that matter. He will come of age, as they say, under the watchful eye of a high-def video camera. The apparatus grants the film a certain whimsy and keen sensitivity to place, both reminiscent of Klapisch's When the Cat's Away. Even when Xavier behaves poorly, then pouts when there's a price to pay, you never feel he's at risk, exactly.

So, he learns to "appreciate" a woman from his Belgian roommate Isabelle (Cécile De France, who won a César for Best Newcomer), then embarks on a lazy affair with Anne-Sophie, because she's lovely and yearning, not because he actually thinks much of her. And it's all sort of okay, not egregious, because Jean-Michel doesn't pay enough attention to her. The guys argue when the truth comes out. But that doesn't mean Jean-Michel and Anne-Sophie won't come to Xavier's going away party at film's end. Sweet.

Xavier's does endure a couple of jolts. For one thing, he realizes soon that he will never win the heart of Isabelle because she is a lesbian. She offers him solace ("I wish you were a woman"), and he laughs at the cosmic glitch that seems to be his experience at the moment: "The world is badly made."

It's a clever line, but the world is actually quite fine in L'Auberge Espagnole, whose one-from-every-food-group approach leads to sketches more than characters, identified by cultural quirks, rather like Xavier sees the world. Soon he meets a much more egregious version of such thinking, in Wendy's younger brother William (Kevin Bishop), who makes fun of each roomie's accent, and makes Hitler jokes at Tobias, thinking his worldview is the one everyone shares, baffled when others are offended. Xavier's self-involvement is subtler (though he does through a period of believing he's seeing Erasmus, the historical figure, and visits Jean-Michel for a neurological exam, not even thinking that the man might know about and resent the affair).

But if Xavier remains annoyingly egocentric, the film is, on another and more remarkable level, about exactly that. It points out associations between commercial and cultural globalizations, but celebrates rather than laments the loss of fixed identities.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.