TV

'24 Hours in the ER' Asks Meaningful Questions

Renée Scolaro Mora

Along with showing injuries and traumas, the BBC's 24 Hours in the ER asks some pretty meaningful questions about mortality, aging, faith, and family relationships.

24 Hours in the ER

Airtime: Tuesdays, 9pm ET
Cast: Malcolm Tunnicliff, Firas, Jen, Kim, Maria
Subtitle: Series Premiere
Network: BBC America
Director: Anthony Philipson
Air date: 2011-09-27
Website
Amazon

Filmed over a 28-day period in King's College Hospital, the 14 episodes of 24 Hours in the ER each follow a single day in one of London's busiest Accident and Emergency departments. With 70 remote cameras and staff on site 24 hours a day, the "observational documentary" expands beyond the usual selection of fantastic and gruesome medical cases. It also asks some pretty meaningful questions about mortality, aging, faith, and family relationships.

Like other medical documentary shows, 24 Hours in the ER intersperses the treatment scenes with interviews with the doctors, nurses, and patients. These are a means to multiple ends. Patients explain their views of their injuries and care, though most don't have much to say while in the ER. The show also withholds some patients' comments, revealing the fates of the most seriously injured only at the very last moments, creating suspense and also aligning the viewer with their confused and frightened families. For some time, you're left to worry whether Theodore, the Greek college student run over and trapped beneath a double-decker bus, ever walks again or even survives.

The doctors and nurses, as expected, are presented as top-notch professionals, but also personable. Somewhat unusual, at least in comparison to American medical shows like Trauma in the ER, off camera questions are included. Some are mundane ("What do you fear?"), while others are more telling. An ER consultant named Firas reveals, "There are days when the job makes you think about your own mortality, more now because of being married and having a baby." He contrasts his duties with what he would want as a patient, explaining that though he's required to try to revive an 85-year-old man in cardiac arrest, it's nothing he would choose for himself in the situation were reversed: "If a person dies in that circumstance, its not dignified." Senior Nurse Jen details her own coping mechanism when she prepares the body of a deceased patient with care and sensitivity, speaking to him, unsure if he might be "watching" her.

Firas' comment connects to a broader point 24 Hours in the ER is making, that for many people, the ER becomes a kind of proving ground. Liz, the ER Chief of Staff, explains that coming through the ER is an experience everyone should have at least once, "because it makes you realize what your priorities are. It's not the rush, rush, rush, and the money, money, money. It's the people you love, the fact that one minute they might be there and the next minute they might be gone."

Confrontations with such frightening possibilities are illustrated time and again: Will crashes his bicycle and is unconscious or confused for upwards of nine hours while his family grows increasingly alarmed; 81-year-old George has come into the ER for the fourth time with "breathing difficulties" and his much younger great-nephew looks on, stressed (and we worry about George too as it becomes clear Jay is using the past tense talking about him in his interview bits). A middle-aged daughter finally realizes that her father is aging after a serious fall ("Dads are not supposed to fall down the stairs or have accidents or die. They are supposed to be there for you forever"), while her father has to face the same reality about himself ("When do you suddenly say, 'I'm too old to do that?'"). And more than one patient wonders whether "someone" might be looking over him.

Like any emergency room, this one treats less serious injuries that afford a break from the ordeals. Some of these provide an almost comic relief. Scenes showing doctors and nurses working together suggest how their personalities are affected by their profession, like a tendency to underestimate seemingly minor injuries in their own families or the "buzz" they get when a particularly bad accident victim in en route to the hospital ("We've got a juicy one coming in"). As if trying to contain the trauma in the telling, Malcolm describes the details of Theodore's bus accident in all its astonishing detail.

Such moments make the show engaging, to be sure. We are afforded perspectives on staff and patients alike. But, this ER runs almost too smoothly. Anyone who has ever visited an ER will be left wondering how there are no long waits, no disgruntled patients, or impatient medical personnel, and the series offers no criticism of England's National Health Service (NHS).

We might also consider the timing of 24 Hours in the ER premiere in the U.S., as debates and legal challenges to a national health care system continue. The show refutes the horror stories of abandoned elderly and poor patients that opponents of such a system often evoke. And yet, in excluding anything resembling shortcomings or outright failures in the ER, it leaves us less reassured than skeptical.

7

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image