Capote in Kansas: A Ghost Story by Kim Powers

Phoebe Kate Foster

In light of Truman Capote's taste for notoriety, he's probably not rolling over in his grave about the grotesque things attributed to him in this misbegotten book. But if I were Harper Lee, I’d be mad. Damned mad.

Capote in Kansas: A Ghost Story

Publisher: Carroll & Graff
ISBN: 0786720336
Author: Kim Powers
Price: $23.99
Length: 304
Formats: Hardcover
US publication date: 2007-09
"What is fame? The advantage of being known by people of whom you yourself know nothing, and for whom you care as little."

-- Lord Byron

In the South, it’s considered very bad manners to speak ill of the dead or to cast aspersions on the living. In Capote in Kansas, Kim Powers does both. Riding on the coattails of the popular 2005 film Capote, the author capitalizes on the In Cold Blood sensationalism to create a bizarre and distasteful fictionalization of the last days of Truman Capote and his lifelong friendship with Harper Lee of To Kill a Mockingbird fame.

Capote and Lee grew up together in Monroeville, a small Alabama town. Lee went on to write her Pulitzer Prize winning novel, which drew on her and Capote’s childhood experiences. It was the only book she ever wrote. She retired from the limelight and returned to leading a quiet life in her hometown, where she still resides today at the age of 81.

Capote went on to write numerous books that won awards (but not a Pulitzer) and lead a highly publicized life as one of Manhattan’s more outrageous glitterati. He threw parties that turned into media events, was a regular at Studio 54 as well as gay bathhouses, made friends -- and subsequently, enemies -- out of society's crème de la crème, appeared drunk and incoherent on late night talk shows and gained a reputation for his eccentricities, excesses and acerbic tongue. In Cold Blood, his “nonfiction novel” about the gruesome murders of the Clutter family in Kansas that he researched with Lee’s help, was published in 1965. It was his last completed book and he died in 1984 of acute alcoholism and multiple drug intoxication.

Capote in Kansas’s thin plot centers on two literary myths, neither of particularly earth-shaking importance to anyone: first, that Capote ghostwrote one-hit-wonder Lee’s iconic novel and second, that Capote became so obsessed with the Kansas murders and its two psychopathic perpetrators that he was unable to write anything of significance after In Cold Blood.

Powers portrays a demented Truman Capote anonymously sending nasty, necrophilic, handmade gifts to his old friend Lee when not wallowing in his own filth on his deathbed or wandering half-naked in the desert around his Palm Springs home. At night, the ghosts of the Clutter family pay malevolent visitations to him, driving him deeper into the dark recesses of madness. The many pages of unfinished last novel consist of only one word written over and over again: heliotrope

Harper Lee fares even worse in Powers’ hands. She’s a bona fide nut case herself, holed up in her old childhood home, afraid of everyone and everything, and sleeping with a loaded gun because she also experiences nightly visits from the Clutter specters. Instead of working on a new book, she spends her days writing long, rambling letters to her dead brother and hanging around the graveyard where her family is buried. She wishes she’d been born a man and obsesses over the lost, hand-penned manuscript of To Kill a Mockingbird that would prove her to be its true author.

The book’s premises verge on ridiculous. Anyone who has read the works of the two writers in question knows that their literary styles are distinctive and different. It’s obvious that the reason why Capote never produced another finished work had to do with spirits found in a bottle, not hovering over his bed at night. Moreover, Powers is not a sufficiently skillful literary illusionist to do the impossible and make this story either credible or compelling. The writing is erratic and repetitive, and the occasional flashes of brilliance aren’t enough to carry their reader through the novel’s seemingly endless 251 pages of fabricated, over-the-top fluh.

Truman in Kansas offends aesthetic sensibilities by going well beyond the bounds of literary license. Capote’s sybaritic, self-indulgent, destructive and squandered life is well documented already. There’s no need to embellish upon it in a work of fiction. As for the still-living Lee, there is no evidence that justifies characterizing her as a neurotic, delusional, sexually maladapted recluse. She stepped out of the public eye because she wanted to live like a normal person, not a celebrity. Asked by an interviewer why she never wrote another book, she replied, “When you have a hit like that, you can’t go anywhere but down.” Sounds like a sensible and eminently sane woman to me.

In light of Truman’s taste for notoriety, he's probably not rolling over in his grave about the grotesque things attributed to him in this misbegotten book. But if I were Harper Lee, I’d be mad. Damned mad. And if I were Kim Powers, I'd watch out. Some night in the future, a certain disgruntled spirit from Monroeville just might pay an unsettling little visit to him.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.