Gene & Eddie: True Enough: Gene & Eddie with Sir Joe at Ru-Jac

True Enough collects the Maryland-based soul duo’s complete recordings for the Sir Joe Quarterman-owned Ru-Jac label.

Gene & Eddie

True Enough: Gene & Eddie with Sir Joe at Ru-Jac

Label: Omnivore Recordings
US Release Date: 2016-09-02
UK Release Date: 2016-09-02

As the story goes, the all-white showband the Nightcaps were, by the mid-‘60s, in the market for a new vocalist. Eugene Alton Dorsett and Eddie Best, Jr., better known as Gene & Eddie, happened to be in the market for a band. When their paths crossed, they became one of the first truly integrated acts at a time when such a thing was virtually unheard of. Because of this distinction, the Nightcaps (plus Gene & Eddie) landed a number of high-profile gigs in the Washington, D.C. area. Chief among these was at a party hosted by the Johnson administration during the height of civil unrest. Certainly a politically motivated (and shrewdly calculated) move on the part of the Johnson administration, it was nevertheless an impressive step for a group rooted in a style built on and around the effects of segregation.

Together, Gene & Eddie and the Nightcaps took the Washington, D.C.-area music scene by storm, becoming one of the top draws in the area. But the integrated pairing was not to last as Gene & Eddie cut ties with the band in 1967 to embark on a career of their own. It was around this same time they cut their first single for the Ru-Jac Records label owned by Baltimore-based songwriter, producer, arranger, and performer Joe “Sir Joe” Quarterman. It is here that the comprehensive Omnivore Recordings collection of Gene & Eddie’s Ru-Jac singles begins. Part of an ongoing series documenting the recorded output of the Baltimore label, True Enough: Gene & Eddie with Sir Joe at Ru-Jac offers a hefty dose of late ‘60s indie label soul.

As a vocal duo, Gene & Eddie display a light, close-harmony style very much in keeping with the times. In other words, nothing about the duo is particularly revelatory in terms of musicality or performance. Rather they serve as a glimpse into the oft-overlooked world of regional soul hits. That there are now so many labels specializing in collecting and issuing these long-forgotten recordings is both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, they afford a broader audience the chance to hear singles generally relegated to the part of the country in which they were recorded and pushed. Yet the sheer number of singles released makes it difficult to sort out the truly worthwhile singles from those aping then-prominent national styles (i.e. Motown, Stax, and Atlantic).

So while True Enough manages to bring together everything Gene & Eddie recorded for the Ru-Jac label, it’s not all necessarily worth further analysis. That said, it’s only a small portion of the collection that falls into the derivative category as the remainder shows a surprising depth to Sir Joe’s skills as a writer and arranger. And it’s really Quarterman whose talents are on display despite Gene & Eddie receiving top billing. With the majority of the collection having been penned by Quarterman—not to mention the handful of stellar lead vocal performances he delivers throughout the collection—it’s more a showcase for Sir Joe and the label he founded. Indeed, these songs could well have been recorded by any number of vocal duos and would likely have been just as good.

This isn’t to say that Gene & Eddie weren’t capable performers and writers. Their original “Darling I Love You” is a fine example of late ‘60s East Coast soul, while “It’s So Hard” is a smooth 6/8 soul ballad with gorgeous harmonies and some unique falsetto work. Similarly, “Why Do You Hurt Me” is a lush ballad featuring a fine vocal performance and a sumptuous orchestral arrangement. Here it becomes clear that their strong suit was more nuanced balladry than the funkier R&B scattered throughout the collection. “She’s True Enough” is a lightweight take on Sam & Dave that doesn’t quite fit with the duo’s aesthetic—while wickedly funky and possessing several impressive syncopated vocal breaks, it can’t help but sound like a pale imitation of the more well-known vocal duo and their work with Booker T & the MGs.

Both “Check You Later” and “It’s So Hard” provide the chance to hear the duo with the Nightcaps. Given the time in which these particular recordings were made—roughly 1965-1966—their earlier rock ‘n’ roll-inflected sound feels incongruous when taken with the rest of the collection. Here they are more of a party band than elsewhere and, despite the energy, tend to drag. But as these are meant to be the complete recordings for Ru-Jac, their inclusion is necessary. True Enough may not be essential, but it will certainly please those who enjoy the lesser-heard sounds of regional soul acts. While there are better artists and collections out there, True Enough is well worth the listen.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.