Music

Soft Cell: The Very Best of Soft Cell

Charlotte Robinson

Soft Cell

The Very Best of Soft Cell

Label: Mercury
US Release Date: 2002-11-05
UK Release Date: 2002-04-01
Amazon
iTunes

I'm so tired of bitching about sloppy, incomplete compilations that it's a thrill to find myself non-stop ecstatic dancing to The Very Best of Soft Cell. This latest in a long line of compilations of the early '80s synth-pop duo's hits (including a 1991 mostly remixes package with the misleading title Memorabilia: Singles) is the only one you need. What makes it so superior is its scope; The Very Best Of betters the The Singles 1981-1985, previously the most representative collection of Soft Cell's work, by eight tracks, including the essential "Where Did Our Love Go?" and "Sex Dwarf". Also included are two new recordings that are as good as, if not better than, any of the older material, which shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who heard Soft Cell's 2002 high-quality comeback Cruelty Without Beauty.

Highlights are many. The coolly hot robotic drone of the Daniel Miller-produced debut single "Memorabilia" should make it a far more respected dance-floor favorite than it is. "Sex Dwarf" provides just the kind of pure evil fun you'd expect from the title, with demented lyrics about bondage and "luring disco dollies to a life of vice". On "It's a Mugs Game", vocalist Marc Almond one-ups himself by portraying the dark side of nightlife in as horrific a manner as possible, singing: "You never were one for holding drink / And you stagger up to the toilet and you throw up / Like it was Christmas / And you miss the bowl / And you hit your shoes and there's no paper towel". "Down in the Subway" is another winner, containing Almond's favorite themes of love gone wrong, self-loathing, and seedy environs set to a rockabilly/cabaret hybrid sound replete with chain-gang-style backing vocals. And of course there is the fabulous "Tainted Love", the top-selling British single of 1981 and Soft Cell's only substantial American hit, which has become a staple of alternative radio, dance clubs, and even television commercials -- and rightly so, because it is as catchy, danceable, and lovesick as any enduring pop hit could be. A few tracks on the latter half of the disc are blander, more standard dance fare, but that's less a weakness of the compilers than of Soft Cell itself, whose drug problems by that time were getting in the way of the music. The good news is that even the worst tracks on The Very Best of Soft Cell aren't bad, and the new tracks and remixes that end the album close it on a high note.

What's most impressive about hearing the work of Marc Almond and musical partner Dave Ball twenty years on is how diverse in scope it is. While synthesizers dominate their sound (although horns occasionally punctuate the mix), Ball and Almond covered a lot of ground with their limited palette. They are equally convincing at the hard-edged electro of "Memorabilia" as on the sleazy "Sex Dwarf" or the sweet ballad "Say Hello, Wave Goodbye". Of course, the sleazier tracks are the most fun, and the duo seemed to know it, going so far as to proclaim its sound "sleazy listening". Northerners who felt distant from the pretentious glamour of London, they also, as Almond says in the liner notes, "came from punk and post-punk", which is obvious in their choice of Mike Hedges (The Cure, Siouxsie & the Banshees) as longtime producer. Soft Cell is something like Erasure's evil twin; while both pioneered a gay synth/dance sound, Soft Cell's version was always a little harder, darker, and more dangerous. Now that the post-grunge animosity toward the '80s has been replaced by imitative nostalgia, the time is right for rediscovering Soft Cell -- and finally, with the release of The Very Best Of, novices will have a logical starting point.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image