Marykate O'Neil: Underground

Mike Newmark

The Brooklyn singer/songwriter's third full-length album is mired in the time-tested formulas and pre-chewed sound of adult-oriented rock.

Marykate O'Neil


Label: Nettwerk
US Release Date: 2009-02-03
UK Release Date: Unavailable

The word "underground" must hold special significance for Marykate O'Neil. The Brooklyn-based singer/songwriter took the name of her third full-length record from a book she read on the Underground Press Syndicate (UPS), a network of zines specializing in countercultural editorials that boomed in the late '60s. The UPS no longer exists, but O'Neil steadfastly believes the insights, artistry, and independent spirit that once graced the pages of the East Village Other and the San Francisco Oracle are alive and well today -- just a little harder to track down than they used to be.

No doubt O'Neil sees the relation of this story to her own. She's one of the artists who exist in the elusive "underground" of the 21st century, where the rise of networking sites and the sheer number of voices calling for our attention compromise our ability to distinguish brilliance from bullshit. There's no one-stop-shop for independent art that O'Neil can use to reach as many ears as she might wish, and despite hooking up with Jill Sobule and producers Roger Moutenot (Yo La Tengo, Sleater-Kinney) and Ken Maiuri (Pedro the Lion), she remains largely East Coast-bound, her name less familiar as it heads toward the Pacific Ocean.

"I don't want to leave the underground", O'Neil sings on the title track, so perhaps her heart isn't at all set on mainstream listenership. But there is a conspicuous difference between her and the underground artists she shares a zeitgeist with. From singer/songwriters to noise-rockers to improvisational experimentalists, it's safe to claim that indie musicians are bound by some degree of iconoclasm. If x represents the time-tested formulas and middle-of-the-road sound of mainstream rock, indie musicians will rough up x, add mystery and intrigue to x, juxtapose x with surprising lyricism, or try valiantly to jettison x altogether. Marykate O'Neil plays x. Even to those who don't keep Jill Sobule and Lisa Loeb on heavy rotation, O'Neil's adult-oriented rock with folk and country overtones will feel incredibly familiar; versions of it pipe through the PA systems of supermarkets, restaurants, and drugstores across the country. Her lyrics, folksy and strikingly average, may speak of escape -- she takes pills while traveling in "Nashville", and calls in sick to catch a band's set in "One Thousand Times a Day" -- but the music wants to stay right here.

Not that Underground doesn't sound nice at times, but used to describe independent music, "nice" is almost always a backhanded compliment, signifying a shortage of substance or reasons to pay much attention to it. 'Oh, this is nice,' I thought when I first heard "Green Street", the album's starter and de facto single, and regarding the following three tracks: 'This is nice, too.' Niceness swiftly became blandness with repeated listens, and after a while I couldn't approach it without cleansing my palate first. O'Neil and her small army of collaborators threw a cornucopia of instruments at Underground, far more than the record's AOR categorization would suggest: guitars, violins, keyboards and electronics, organs, harmoniums, tambourines, glockenspiels, shakers, bottles, and even the human knee. Weirdly, this only amplifies the music's x-ness. "Green Street" is the record's high point, but it still sags under the weight of everything that went into creating its static sound. Sharper production might have given each instrument a clearer identity and a symbiotic function within the overall system. Conversely, I longed for a lo-fi crackle absent in the country-folk numbers "Nashville" and "Saved", gummy and fatigued where they should have been dusty and raw.

O'Neil's own voice emerges as the most prominent instrument of all (in typical singer/songwriter fashion), and it could prove to be a deal breaker. Falling in between Lisa Loeb and Retsin's Cynthia Nelson, but with a tarter, less precious quality than either of them, her vocals never quite find the correct balance. When she sings softly her voice quavers, but not delicately, when she sings loudly it tends to blare, and when it's somewhere in the middle it still sounds loud. It's a shame that Auto-Tune is so prevalent in the music industry, but O'Neil could have used it in spots: in "Saved" she tends to go sharp, in "Attention", flat. There isn't much more to say about it, really. The slightly nasally, slightly earthy tone of O'Neil's voice has its fans, and they'll appreciate its authenticity, warts and all. But for my money it's a detraction, a repellant that hits the ears all wrong and a flaming hoop to jump through if I'm to enjoy the listening experience.

Criticizing this album makes me feel like I've just kicked a kitten, if it's any consolation. Despite the passion Underground fails to invoke in me, I can tell that O'Neil's heart is very much in it. Just because she plays it extraordinarily safe doesn't mean she aimed for edginess and simply missed the mark. And even if an abhorrent record is strangely more of an accomplishment than the nice one this sometimes is, we'd be remiss to take its pleasantness for granted. But solely as a piece of music that can be bought, popped into a disc drive, and played, Underground is thoroughly unimpressive. What we have here is a paradox: O'Neil doesn't align herself with mainstream culture, even though the manner in which she and her musicians handle the recording suggests otherwise. And yet, there's so little to separate Underground from singer/songwriter albums of its ilk that it's difficult to imagine O'Neil reaching many more listeners than she now does, especially without taking care of the sticking points the next time she decides to release something. If she doesn't ever want to leave the underground, she may get her wish.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.