Wallace & Gromit in Fright of the Bumblebees

The only thing missing from the game is that strange sense of doll house spectacle that the original productions could create.

Wallace & Gromit in Fright of the Bumblebees

Publisher: Telltale Games
Players: 1
Price: $8.95
Platforms: XBox 360 (reviewed), PC
ESRB Rating: Everyone
Developer: Telltale Games
Release date: 2009-05-27

At this point in the development of TellTale Games, they have their formula pretty nailed down. Warm the player up with a few puzzles that occur in a limited space so they’re easy to solve, introduce the main plot arc for that episode, expand the area they can travel around and give them a mutli-task puzzle that can be solved in any order, and double down on another wave of multi-task puzzles followed by a finishing puzzle that, like the beginning, should be easy on the player and leave them with a nice feeling. TellTale’s latest episodic effort, Wallace & Gromit, sticks to the formula while using a new brand of humor for the content.


I’ve used any number of analogies to describe TellTale’s games: interactive sitcom or a sophisticated Tivo experience, the point being that this particular brand of adventure game is meant to be a pleasant, short experience.  A minimalist interface and an optional hint system make it possible that you won’t even need the walkthrough for these games (though they’re freely available on the website). The point is to give the player into that pleasant sensation of being rewarded for solving problems at a nice fluid pace. Any puzzle that gets you stuck should only require a hint or two to get you moving in the right direction. The game deserves special credit for improving on the hint system of the Sam & Max episodes. The various characters around you will now bark out suggestions, making the hints less intrusive. As always, they are just clever enough to not simply give away the puzzle because they leave enough information out about a puzzle for you to draw the final conclusion.


The first episode, “Fright of the Bumblebees,” starts off just like an episode from the original show. The familiar music wafts in, Wallace drops through an elaborate contraption, and your first task is to make him breakfast while playing as Gromit. Play is divided between the two characters, and their observations about the situation blend into each other. Gromit, upon finding a pair of dogtags that Wallace bought for him, always throws them away. When you switch to Wallace, he’ll pick them up. In this way, clues will be layered on top of one another depending on who you are playing as. Once an item has been used, it gets thrown out of the inventory, and once a place no longer has anything to do in it, the game skips past it when you try to walk there. After Gromit fixes breakfast, an irate neighbor swings by to offer Wallace a deal. He’ll drop the charges against Wallace for wrecking his store if he’ll deliver fifty gallons of honey by the end of the day.


Overall the game nails the feel of the show fairly well. Playing as Wallace, we invent and combine items to make a crazy solution to our honey problem. Gromit, who never talks, must clean up the mess that the player generates as Wallace. It’s hard to not compare the game to Sam & Max because of the buddy dynamic, but the developers are smart to give Gromit his own time. While the show can rely on Gromit’s facial expressions and pacing to endear us to him, the game has to give Gromit his own identifying activities. That’s not to say that a lot of Gromit’s classic humor isn’t present in the game; when he doesn’t want to do something, he’ll just shake his head, and when people talk to him, he still gives that same arched eyebrow. But the dynamics of the joke are gone without a TV show’s traditional pacing. The game tidily takes care of this in its own unique way by identifying each character with certain kinds of puzzles. Wallace collects and his multi-task puzzle involves inventing something new. Gromit helps people and his own puzzles involve undoing Wallace’s mess.


The game’s animators deserve credit for also recreating the aesthetic of the show fairly well. Gromit’s arms and legs move in that strange, almost impossible motion wherever he walks. When the light hits him just right you can see stretching for what would be the clay molding of the character. The hands and mouths in particular got a lot of attention, somehow managing to animate in 3-D so that it still looked as it would on the show. The arms will make that same bizarre waggle when a character is excited, and overall the entire thing animates like a proper claymation feature.


I have two complaints about the game.. If you’re playing it on an Xbox 360, the controls are a bit wonky. Movement is right stick, and the object of attention is left stick. The problem comes in when you’re trying to get your character to look at something, and instead they look at something else. You can use the bumper buttons to manually go through each visible item but that gets a bit tedious. I’m not sure what solution that I would recommend, since the game was originally designed for a mouse, except to just make the left stick control a cursor. Players who find it clumsy can use the bumpers (which they will anyways) while those who know exactly what they want can target it much more quickly. This gets particularly intense with a puzzle involving the multi-part egg cooking machine early on in the game but never gets that irritating afterwards.   


The second complaint that I have also seen addressed on web forums is the voice actor used for Wallace, who suffers from a distinct case of not being Peter Sallis. A fellow by the name of Ben Whitehead does the voice for the game and to his credit it’s nearly pitch perfect. Speaking as someone whose watched every show and movie in the franchise, the only time I really noticed Whitehead was when he screeches and howls. Sallis, to his credit, does a very unique exasperated shriek.


The only thing missing from the game is that strange sense of doll house spectacle that the original productions could create. I had the good fortune of seeing a Wallace & Gromit set at a museum in England and it only magnified the strange subtle pleasure of Aardman’s animation: the thrill of watching dolls come alive and live in a tiny world. The game by expertly placing us in the role of Wallace and his loyal friend seems to have removed that element. The world is now real, the dolls are now people, and you are a part of it. In its video game form, Wallace & Gromit works well, but it does not work quite like the show does.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.