'The Bold Type' Is Fun, But It Could Go Bolder

Aisha Dee, Meghann Fahy, Katie Stevens star in The Bold Type (Photo credit: Freeform).

Is the vibe of sincerity real in The Bold Type, or merely a veneer applied like a coat of pretty nail polish because suddenly, feminism is fashionable?

The Bold Type

Airtime: Tuesdays, 9pm
Cast: Katie Stevens, Aisha Dee, Meghann Fahy
Subtitle: Season 1, Episode 1 - "Pilot"
Network: Freeform
Air date: 2017-06-20

A conversation that takes place at around the halfway mark of the pilot of The Bold Type is perhaps key to understanding the show as a whole: the African-American social media director (Aisha Dee) at Scarlet, a Glamour/ Cosmopolitan-type publication tells the lesbian Muslim feminist photographer (Nikohl Boosheri) she's trying to feature in the magazine's glossy pages that Scarlet represents "stealth feminism": "it's no longer how to please your man -- or woman -- in bed; it’s about how to please yourself."

"Stealth feminism" is the best way to understanding the kind of show that The Bold Type is trying to, and largely succeeds at, being: the perfect 40-minute dramedy program for the summer of 2017. The story, which centers on Jane (Katie Stevens, Faking It), Kat (Dee, Sweet/Vicious), and Sutton (Meghann Fahy, Political Animals), three ambitious young employees at Scarlet, mixes an overall light tone with measured seriousness (when it’s required by the plot) that makes it a largely enjoyable experience that doesn't require the same amount of concentration or focus as a Game of Thrones, much less a Veronica Mars. Each character in the pilot comes decently well-formed, and continues to be developed at a fairly rapid pace in the following few episodes.

Jane, a new writer on staff at Scarlet, finds herself taken under editor-in-chief Jacqueline's (Melora Hardin, Transparent) wing, but struggles with figuring out how to write content she’s proud of without digging too much into her own insecurities and painful past experiences. Kat, the aforementioned social-media manager, finds herself falling for the aforementioned lesbian Muslim feminist photographer, Adena, despite previously identifying as straight. Sutton, another writer's personal assistant, is caught up in a whirlwind affair with a member of Scarlet’s board of managers (Samuel Page, Mad Men).

There's a disparity in the first few episodes of the show regarding the amount of attention given to each character’s overall arc, which my description of Jane's, Kat's, and Sutton's pilot plotlines hints at. Even a few episodes later, it’s clear that Jane's arc will have a lot to do with her own self-confidence as both a young woman and as a writer, with Jacqueline -- and Scarlet as a whole -- functioning as the female role model she never had. Each article she has to write ends up tapping into some aspect of her backstory -- a painful breakup, issues with her body -- and her interactions with Jacqueline are often heartwarming, as Hardin convincingly plays a woman who is both an incredibly successful magazine editor and a wise, warm mentor to a writer in whom she clearly sees herself.

Sutton's story gets a boost in the second episode, when it's revealed that she wants more from life than being financially successful (she wants to work in fashion rather than ad sales), but her low-income background makes her less likely to take that kind of risk. This backstory addition is particularly fortunate, as her relationship with the much-older board member seems like a mistake waiting to happen.

While it's wonderful to see Kat exploring her own sexuality and navigating the development of romantic feelings for Adena, her development seems thus far to be largely tied to this storyline, rather than giving us some idea of her backstory, or what makes her tick; that is, why she wants to work at Scarlet, and why social media in particular is her calling. As Adena is only listed as appearing in five out of the ten episodes of The Bold Type’s first season, I do hope that subsequent episodes will take more care to establish Kat as a character outside of this romance, as sweet and quietly impactful as is the romance itself.

Another issue that I do hope the show explores in later episodes is the potential emotional drain inherent in the kind of pieces Jane is expected to write for Scarlet, and how she’s continually expected to unearth and display these most painful and secret parts of herself in order to entertain readers, satisfy her editor, and take home her paycheck. While "it-happened-to-me" articles, done right about significant topics, can be incredibly important and illuminating regarding personal experiences, it comes off as a little exploitative that these kinds of tell-alls seem to be the bulk of what Jane is writing. The Bold Type would do well in addressing that aspect of her job rather than just treating each embarrassing or traumatizing event she's supposed to relive and write about as something that's easily gotten over.

The bigger question I have in mind as I continue to watch the show: is the vibe of sincerity the show throws off something that matters to The Bold Type at its core, or is it merely a veneer that the show applies like a coat of nail polish because suddenly "feminism" (or some version of it) is fashionable? In many ways, mainstream media does move more slowly than societal discourse, and it's certainly refreshing to see characters with a variety of racial identities and sexual orientations proudly discuss that they're feminists, and what being a feminist means to them, rather than presenting themselves as cool, reasonable girls in contrast to the hysterical and manipulative designated "feminist" characters (looking at you, Veronica Mars' third season).

Likewise, there's absolutely value in watching Kat and Adena have a frank discussion about why the latter's decision to wear a hijab is a feminist one, because it's answering a question that surely many viewers without Muslim women friends find themselves wanting to ask. Yet on its face, despite its feminist protestations, The Bold Type isn't really doing that much to shift the conversation about working women, or young women, or other politically relevant topics. Jane, Sutton, and Kat are all suitably conventionally attractive for television’s purposes, with endless wardrobes paid for by jobs that are for the most part secure (oh, for an episode that digs into an #EbonyOwes type of issue!); The Bold Type, in this regard, could stand to go a little bolder.

Indeed, it’s not clear whether "stealth feminism" is really enough at this point. In 2017, haven't we moved past the idea that "leaning in" to your work, taking charge of what sex positions you and your significant other are going to use, and having all the choices you could ever want isn't the goal of the fight for gender equality? Then again, it's telling that The Bold Type is a Freeform show rather than on one of the major networks or cable stations, because it's basically what Teen Vogue has become post-2016 election: pretty, fashionable, with admirable aspirations towards being politically progressive and hard-hitting, yet bound to be continually underestimated because its designated audience -- and subject matter -- is young women and teenage girls.


To be a migrant worker in America is to relearn the basic skills of living. Imagine doing that in your 60s and 70s, when you thought you'd be retired.

Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century

Publisher: W. W. Norton
Author: Jessica Bruder
Publication date: 2017-09

There's been much hand-wringing over the state of the American economy in recent years. After the 2008 financial crisis upended middle-class families, we now live with regular media reports of recovery and growth -- as well as rising inequality and decreased social mobility. We ponder what kind of future we're creating for our children, while generally failing to consider who has already fallen between the gaps.

Keep reading... Show less

The World of Captain Beefheart: An Interview with Gary Lucas and Nona Hendryx

Gary Lucas and Nona Hendryx (photo © Michael DelSol courtesy of Howlin' Wuelf Media)

Guitarist and band leader Gary Lucas and veteran vocalist Nona Hendryx pay tribute to one of rock's originals in this interview with PopMatters.

From the opening bars of "Suction Prints", we knew we had entered The World of Captain Beefheart and that was exactly where we wanted to be. There it was, that unmistakable fast 'n bulbous sound, the sudden shifts of meter and tempo, the slithery and stinging slide guitar in tandem with propulsive bass, the polyrhythmic drumming giving the music a swing unlike any other rock band.

Keep reading... Show less

From Haircut 100 to his own modern pop stylings, Nick Heyward is loving this new phase of his career, experimenting with genre with the giddy glee of a true pop music nerd.

In 1982, Nick Heyward was a major star in the UK.

As the leader of pop sensations Haircut 100, he found himself loved by every teenage girl in the land. It's easy to see why, as Haircut 100 were a group of chaps so wholesome, they could have stepped from the pages of Lisa Simpson's "Non-Threatening Boys" magazine. They resembled a Benetton knitwear advert and played a type of quirky, pop-funk that propelled them into every transistor radio in Great Britain.

Keep reading... Show less

Kehr was one of the best long-form essay writers people read for clear and sometimes brutally honest indictments of film.

It's perhaps too trite and rash to conclude that the age of good, cogent film criticism is over. They still exist out there, always at print publications such as The New Yorker and at major newspapers like The New York Times. An argument can be made that the late, legendary film critic Roger Ebert became a better writer when he departed from cinema and covered literature, book collecting, or even the simplest pleasures of life. If we look at the film criticism of James Agee from the '40s, or even the short but relevant stint of novelist and short story writer Graham Greene as a film critic, we come to understand that the greatest writing about film went beyond the spectrum of what they saw on the screen.
Keep reading... Show less

This book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Marcelino Truong launched his autobiographical account of growing up in Saigon during the Vietnam War with the acclaimed graphic novel Such a Lovely Little War: Saigon 1961-63, originally published in French in 2012 and in English translation in 2016. That book concluded with his family's permanent relocation to London, England, as the chaos and bloodshed back home intensified.

Now Truong continues the tale with Saigon Calling: London 1963-75 (originally published in French in 2015), which follows the experiences of his family after they seek refuge in Europe. It offers a poignant illustration of what life was like for a family of refugees from the war, and from the perspective of young children (granted, Truong's family were a privileged and upper class set of refugees, well-connected with South Vietnamese and European elites). While relatives and friends struggle to survive amid the bombs and street warfare of Vietnam, the displaced narrator and his siblings find their attention consumed by the latest fashion and music trends in London. The book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.