Freud's Couch, Scott's Buttock's, Brontë's Grave' Is a Bit Cheeky, but Conservative

Simon Goldhill

Given the chance to write any kind of book on literary culture, this Cambridge professor chooses dead, white male established figures, oh – and the Brontë Sisters (everyone’s token girl writers!). No boundaries broken here.

Freud's Couch, Scott's Buttocks, Brontë's Grave

Publisher: University of Chicago Press, London
Length: 130 pages
Author: Simon Goldhill
Price: $22.50
Format: Hardcover
Publication date: 2011-11

At least in the opening chapter, ‘The Golden Ticket’, academic and writer Simon Goldhill has the grace to acknowledge that receiving a book commission such as this one was like a gift from heaven. His editor told him to “Make a pilgrimage… go anywhere and write about it.” He spends the next few pages agonising over how and where he should achieve this, and so evolves this reinterpretation of the ‘Victorian fad’ for literary tourism thacht took on the reverent aura of pilgrimage as the 19th century progressed. So, he amusingly offers up a fetish item for each writer he trails. Sigmund Freud’s couch, obviously, Emily Brontë’s grave; because she grew up in close proximity to a cemetery, presumably, died young and was, well, Victorian. And ‘Scott’s Buttocks’, which as far as I can work out is due to the imprint of Sir Walter Scott’s behind on his study chair at his self-styled home, Abbotsford, near Edinburgh. Scott, crucially, helped with the invention of the celebrity author in the early 19th century and was also a bit weighty in the rear.

When meditating upon celebrity and drawing connections with then and now, Goldhill is a trifle obvious and superficial, unfortunately. Lord Byron, it seems, was just like a James Dean or Kurt Cobain – really? And Scott’s construction of his Victorian, historical, medieval fantasy of a home is just like William Randolph Hearst or Michael Jackson. It reads rather like a Cambridge Don, which is what Goldhill does for a day job, wants us to know he has heard of Cobain and Michael Jackson – he can be cool too! But not exactly contemporary. What would he make of the Kardashians, I wonder? But then again, he probably doesn’t have a television, or if he does only his kids watch it and they don’t get satellite.

He's much happier when ruminating on the past. As he gets into his stride, Goldhill gives us exquisite little snapshots of the ‘shrines’ of the literary past. The sepia tone of the pages, retro-styled cover, and grainy black and white pictures signals that this is intended as some sort of vintage guidebook. It will look elegant on a shelf or coffee table, a little bit intellectual, but a little bit cheeky, with the whole ‘buttock’ thing going on. Pun intended. The perfect gift for Anglophile literary buffs possibly?

His pilgrimage takes in the Lake District homes of William Wordsworth, and he is excellent on the influential role of the poet across time. Next, he ‘seethes’ into Yorkshire on the trail of Emily and her sisters and argues extremely well for the role of novelist Elizabeth Gaskell, Charlotte’s early biographer, as the one responsible for helping create the Brontë myth. He's shocked at the closet-sized room Emily occupied and where she did most of her writing before ailing too badly from consumption and dying on the downstairs sofa. He's more dismissive of the extravagant claims at Stratford-upon-Avon, where the chance to ‘experience Shakespeare’s world’ are, he asserts, inauthentic and impossible to conjure.

This is part travelogue, part literary and social critique of the reception and perpetuation of fame in culture. When he is on solid territory: analysing the social and cultural impact of writers, Goldhill is fine and insightful. When he tries to inject more contemporary popular culture references he sounds more like the uncle who wants to try and be cool – and perhaps appeal to a wider audience. But he's preaching to the converted. This book is not in any danger of widening the already huge appeal of literary tourism – or reviving an interest in any part of Scott, let alone his poor buttocks – anytime soon. Goldhill needs to stick with the studious Oxbridge tone and not try too hard to be witty, and then it’s just dandy.

Given the chance to write any kind of book on literary culture, this Cambridge professor chooses dead, white male established figures, oh – and the Brontë Sisters (everyone’s token girl writers!). No boundaries broken here.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.