1954: Alcatraz

Eric Swain

The Beats were who they were and the biggest crime of a game trying to portray them is in turning them into squares.

1954: Alcatraz

Publisher: Daedalic Entertainment
Players: 1
Price: $19.99
Platforms: PC
ESRB Rating: Teen
Developer: Daedalic Entertainment
Release Date: 2014-03-11

It's all about style. When you build a game on the foundation of a tried and true formula like the point-and-click adventure game, the only way of differentiating it from what has gone before is the style to which the game is hip to. In this respect at least, 1954: Alcatraz knows where it's at.

Joe is doing time on the Rock for robbing an armored truck and escaping Leavenworth. He says the money burned in the explosion that took the truck, but everyone suspects otherwise. Meanwhile, on the outside, both the cops and Joe's former partner, who is now mob affiliated, are putting the screws on Joe's wife Christine. You'll play as both of them as you try to orchestrate a prison break. Joe needs to plan a way out of the slammer, and Christine needs to find the cash and ready the getaway.

*snaps fingers*

Other than playing the dual characters, 1954: Alcatraz creates something else in the form out of their relationship dynamics. Their trust in each other starts out shaky at best. Marriage can be difficult at the best of times, and it doesn't help that Joe forgot to mention that he was planning this heist in the first place. Depending on their choices this all could lead to a happy reunion and a clean getaway or to a noir-style tragedy. There are several choices throughout the game that allow the two to express their trust and faithfulness in and to each other. Or at least that seems to be the idea. However, this narrative thread is really not of any central importance to the plot.

The truth is that there's not a whole lot that makes 1954: Alcatraz stand out from all the squares marching to same rhythm of dullsville. You are the local kleptomaniac and have to give things to people to get what you want. The characters that hang about and who you deal with are the only blue notes in the otherwise stagnate system. These poets, artists, degenerates, and outsiders express the wilder elements of society yearning to be free of the pinstripe heel threatening to descend. However, they are not going to be destroyed by madness, but by sameness. What's a little larceny, B&E, gay and interracial marriage (all illegal in the US in 1954) between Beats.

*snaps fingers*

But once that well has run dry, these more interesting characters fade into the background like so much scenery. They aren't even given the dignity to burn out. Poor form, man. But poor form also exists in the puzzle design, requiring crisscrossing the city and prison over and over searching for the right set of circumstances that the game wants you to submit to. In the end, entering and leaving the same locations turn Beats into squares. They lose their personality. It doesn't help that a number of solutions don't even make any sense. How can a telephone electrocute a guard? Or why are all the excruciating steps necessary to take to get a woman that I've known for years to admit she is a forger? The more interesting instances of convincing a new gallery owner that my friend is the new “it” artist or getting Sutter and his lover back together after a spat become few and far between.

The main draw of 1954: Alcatraz is in expressing the essence of the counterculture of the 50s. I feel it. I really do. We don't get to see this time period much in media. It gets lost between World War II and the rise of the hippies. Here we get to see drugs and free love assimilated into urban culture instead of in the promise of a communion with nature. The Beats are who they are and the biggest crime of a game trying to portray them is in turning them into squares. They are the educated types ekeing a living out of the underbelly of society. They have a voice -- at least until they run out of words.

The tone is ripe and its style sings, but it can't last. The slog of the form brings it all down, though, man. As with Joe and Christine, the honeymoon is over and now comes the work. And sometimes it ain't worth the effort. You dig?

*snaps fingers*


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.