What Were They Thinking?! Monster Mash-Up

Stefan Robak

Yes, there are a few missteps, but I feel that the creators will only get a better feel for how to approach the material over time.

What Were They Thinking?! Monster Mash-Up

Publisher: BOOM! Studios
Contributors: Writers: Kevin Church, Joe Casey, Keith Giffen, Johanna Stokes, Artists: Steve Ditko and various
Price: $3.99
Writer: Various
Length: 22
Formats: Single Issue
US publication date: 2006-10-18

Just to start I have to say that I'm a huge fan of the school of comedy where one takes an old crappy movie, TV series or comic and just mocks how bad, insane or unintentionally hilarious it is. I love, Mystery Science Theatre 3000, and their comedy brethren. However, while I am a sucker for that kind of humour, I usually find the art of dialogue replacement (a la Woody Allen's What's Up Tiger Lily?) rather unfunny. I find that the stuff is usually funniest with commentary alongside the pure source material since then the audience can appreciate just how bad, insane and unintentionally hilarious it is to begin with. The dialogue replacement stuff is usually a bit sloppy (or very sloppy when amateurs do it at home and post it on YouTube) or it doesn't flow smoothly. But that doesn't mean it can't be great. Does What Were They Thinking?!: Monster Mash-Up succeed where others have failed? Kinda.

What Were They Thinking is a series of one-shots focusing on generic or oddball public domain comics with all of the narration and dialogue replaced or meddled with by some talented comic creators. This particular issue focuses on monsters and romance. Oh, and there's a story about the use of a hat. Monster Mash-Up is a mixed bag that ranges from forgettable and tired to brilliantly funny. The first part, "Barry's Secret Shame" is remixed (I.E. new dialogue) by Joe Casey and while he's usually a good writer and is working with art by Steve Ditko (after a fashion), he doesn't quite hit the mark in this tale of forbidden underwater romance. Unfortunately, the script is mostly a one note joke: a man who is aroused by fish has his fantasy come alive. Luckily the expressions on the main character's face sell the idea that this character does have a secret shame, but I was just expecting a bit more from the creator of GOdLand.

The second comic, "Hairy Grrls" (remixed by Kevin Church and Keith Giffen) is easily the best in the book, thanks to a narrator who is equal parts cynical and insane. The comic starts off well, but it really gets going with the introduction of Lumber Industry Safety Man -- and it only gets more bizarre from there. A Sasquatch in a drill, a sudden bear appearance and other oddities make this one a gem. Next is an oddity called "Hats Off", remixed by Johanna Stokes, one of the writers for the TV series Eureka. This one focuses on some fellows in the jungle who have an argument over hat ownership and copying one another's cool fashions. Also, a monster shows up. Though certainly funny, this one is a bit of a let down after the last comic, but the last page with Sam's death speech definitely made this a hilarious read. "Astro Alien Dog" is a fun one-pager that's essentially a cheesy jungle adventure comic with words like "space" and "astro" pasted in -- literally -- to give it a faux-sci-fi feel.

Then comes "Dirk Rocket & Rick Beardly in Manlust: an Outer Space Adventure Beyond Your Wildest Imagination," remixed by Kevin Church, in which a space adventurer must deal with his secret and shameful lust for his virile, bearded partner. "Manlust" has sort of the problem "Barry's Secret Shame" had, which is that it seems to think that the "gay heroes" joke (much like "the fish lust" joke) is all that's needed to carry the comic. It's only three pages but it starts to feel stale surprisingly fast. The final comic, "Flipper_Boy_47", once again by Kevin Church, also feels like generic internet humour. Not bad, but not really good either; with this as with some of the other weaker stories, the writer seems to be treading water by using a stale old bit. But luckily it has the good sense to be one page. I really can't imagine stretching a merman's blog post much longer than that.

Now, in my opinion, this one shot is a mixed bag, the curse of many anthologies. The majority of these writers are talented (I can't say all simply because I'm not familiar with Kevin Church's work). However, one thing that I'd like to note is that people really have different tastes and opinions for comedies. That's not to say comedy is critic proof, but certain kinds of comedies (particularly those that aren't also concerned with plot and character development) are harder to review simply because the often surreal humour is all there is to review and what works for some people won't necessarily work for others.

Nonetheless, I like the book and would like to see it continue as a series. Yes, there are a few missteps, but I feel that the creators will only get a better feel for how to approach the material over time. They'll eventually figure out how to get consistent laughs (here's one trick: get Keith Giffen to write more stuff) and it could become a sleeper hit if it ever goes monthly.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.