Ani DiFranco: Which Side Are You On?

Photo: Patti Perret

At this point in her career, audiences will know what they think of Ani DiFranco. Which Side Are You On? is unlikely to change this sentiment.

Ani DiFranco

Which Side Are You On?

Label: Righteous Babe
US Release Date: 2012-01-17
UK Release Date: 2012-01-17

It would be easy to suggest that the usually prolific Ani DiFranco’s newest album, Which Side Are You On?, her first in nearly four years, is a direct response to the Occupy Wall Street movement that took hold last year. However, this would be a slight to her previous work, which has always been strongly political and often angry. DiFranco has been producing the same type of music for the last 20 years -- strongly lyrically focused with an activist bent. To pigeonhole her into a movement that has only recently gained steam in the last year would not give her nearly enough credit.

Moreover, even though Which Side Are You On? is built around the union song that Pete Seeger made famous, the album is much more autobiographical than political. The songs about social and political issues are still present -- “Amendment”, “J”, and the title track all feature poignant lyrics with DiFranco’s trademark guitar style, but they aren’t the focus. “Amendment” and the reworked “Which Side Are You On?”, the two longest tracks on the record, however, do warrant extra attention. “Amendment” is the typical DiFranco song in that it features striking lyrics about abortion and privacy, sparsely framed by her guitar. The “Which Side Are You On?” cover strikes a similar vein, albeit with a more urgent tone. The tune rollicks through over six minutes of liberal thought. Especially damning are the lyrics “30 years of diggin' / Got us in this hole / The curse of Reaganomics / Has finally taken it's toll”, which show the essence of DiFranco’s politics.

Yet, what's different here from the bulk of her discography are the autobiographical tendencies that DiFranco continues from her last record, 2008's Red Letter Year. Especially notable are the tender “Hearse” and the sad “Life Boat”. “Life Boat”, the strongest track on the album, tells the story about the loneliness of living on the streets. DiFranco’s lyrics have often been hit or miss, but they are perfectly on point here, writing, “This park bench is a lifeboat / And the rest a big, dark sea / And I’ll just lie here ‘til something comes and finds me." The starkness of the lyrics makes up for the missteps that Ani sometimes makes with her words. In earlier works, DiFranco often felt obliged to include a political message in her songs -- not so on this record, where she often writes just for her own autobiographical purposes. In this regard, she has grown as a writer who no longer needs to be controversial to create her music.

As a total package, Which Side Are You On? is just another addition to DiFranco’s discography. It’s a typical performance from Ani DiFranco, but she has also gradually branched out and grown with her lyric writing. For an artist that’s usually as prolific as DiFranco, the first new record in four years is quite welcome. There is no one in music quite like DiFranco -- from her rejection to major labels to her direct and forthright lyrics about social and political issues, she occupies a certain niche. Her influences from Seeger to Dylan have always shown up and the tribute to Seeger in this record makes this clear. In this manner, DiFranco’s political activism has always seemed rooted in the ‘60s and ‘70s when rock and folk were intertwined in the liberal movements of the day. The current political and economic unrest, although unfortunate, are the perfect new environment for DiFranco. In this case, after 20 years, she may finally see a larger audience from the dissatisfied masses. Which Side Are You On? shows all of DiFranco’s strengths and weaknesses and it displays her increasing maturity where she is finally at peace with herself, but hasn't lost her biting wit. At this point, audiences will know what they think of Ani DiFranco and Which Side Are You On? is unlikely to change this sentiment. Ani DiFranco hasn’t changed, but the political and economic unrest around her has, strengthening her music and message.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.