The Curtain: An Essay in Seven Parts by Milan Kundera

Carlin Romano
The Philadelphia Inquirer (MCT)

The Curtain continues a form Kundera embarked on in The Art of the Novel: lovely, meandering observations on the genre to which he's consecrated his life, with echoes, fresh insights, and -- one must acknowledge -- repetitions of things past.

The Curtain: An Essay in Seven Parts

Publisher: HarperCollins
ISBN: 0060841869
Author: Milan Kundera
Price: $22.95
Length: 176
Formats: Hardcover
US publication date: 2007-01

It's a bearable thought, though a startling one: Forty years have passed since Czech-born Milan Kundera, the once and perhaps future most fashionable European literary writer of his generation, published his first novel, The Joke.

Packed with local description, its modernism plain yet modest, the book struck most local critics as a realist take on the author's postwar communist homeland, a rebuke to the Stalinist '50s in the spirit of the Prague Spring '60s. The revenge-drama plot -- Kundera did plots back then -- revolved around Ludvik Jahn, a veteran who schemes to get back at Pavel, the head of a student tribunal that expelled him from the university and the Communist Party in 1949, by sleeping with Pavel's wife, Helena.

After he'd fled Czechoslovakia for Paris in 1975, Kundera showed little patience for such interpretations. When, he later recalled, a fellow participant in a TV discussion of his works "called The Joke a major indictment of Stalinism, I was quick to interject, `Spare me your Stalinism, please. The Joke is a love story!'" Its origin: a news item of a young woman stealing cemetery flowers to give to her lover.

Kundera has been telling the literary world ever since that he didn't remotely begin as a Czech Solzhenitsyn, but rather as a Europeanized Nabokov, an aesthetic descendant of rambunctious Francois Rabelais, which may explain his ongoing commitment to France as home and French as his literary language.

The Curtain continues a form Kundera embarked on in The Art of the Novel: lovely, meandering observations on the genre to which he's consecrated his life, with echoes, fresh insights, and -- one must acknowledge -- repetitions of things past.

Kundera longed, as an ambitious artist born amid what he calls here "the provincialism of small nations," to be a cosmopolitan European novelist at home with peers like Hermann Broch and Robert Musil, as trickily modern as the Pole Witold Gombrowicz, yet somehow also in a direct line descended from Icelandic sagas. Resentment fueled in a writer by growing up in the European sticks can issue in fierce ways, but in Kundera the upshot was an almost religious exaltation of the novel as art.

That position has always appealed to the world's aesthetically minded literary scholars, bolstering Kundera's prestige, much as his existential irony in novels such as Life is Elsewhere and The Unbearable Lightness of Being made Kundera the hip read of the 1980s for students who might have packed Camus or Hesse if born earlier. Yet Kundera is somewhat unloved in his homeland, now the Czech Republic. There, intellectuals have long chosen sides between him (cerebral, self-regarding, barely political, and at times a cynical expatriate) and playwright/ex-president Vaclav Havel (morally committed, dissident ex-prisoner, defeater of communism, Czech through and through).

The Curtain will do little to alter those perceptions or battle lines, which in the bad old days led Kundera to chide Havel as a moral "exhibitionist" and Havel to view Kundera as mired in decadent kitsch.

Kundera remains a world-class muser on his saintly literary form, which he believes "arises in a freedom that no one can delimit and whose evolution will be a perpetual surprise." His resignation before moral and political reality -- for which Havelites rebuked him -- still persists: "All we can do in the face of that ineluctable defeat called life," he writes, "is to try to understand it ... that is the raison d'etre of the art of the novel."

Here as elsewhere in Kundera's work, history comes with a capital H, though it's simply "a kind of searchlight circling around human existence." One does not go to Kundera, though, for his inchoate metaphysics. When his "curtain" parts to reveal concrete observations of specific writers and connections, the book comes alive.

Flaubert wanted, he remarks, "to de-theatricalize the novel ... (`de-balzacize') it." Anna Karenina's death may seem foreordained to many readers, he shrewdly observes, "but is a trapped person necessarily doomed to suicide? So many people adapt to living in a trap!" Regarding nationalistic pigeonholes for writers, Kundera rails that "Rabelais, ever undervalued by his compatriots, was never better understood than by a Russian, Bakhtin; Dostoyevsky than by a Frenchman, Gide; Ibsen than by an Irishman, Shaw; Joyce than by an Austrian, Broch."

The names may make your head swim if you haven't fulfilled World Lit prerequisites, but those with a taste for grand landscapes of literature will enjoy Kundera's canvas of sweeping aphorism and pointillist reports. Those who regard the novel, like life itself, as flawed may find themselves less infatuated.

For Kundera, it continues as the "privileged sphere of analysis, lucidity, irony." It possesses its own "muse," "genesis," "history," "morality." Novelistic thinking is "fiercely independent of any system of preconceived ideas; it does not judge; it does not proclaim truths; it questions, it marvels, it plumbs."

Relationship counselors have a word for this: idealization. Which suggests a conclusion. The Curtain is a love story. Milan Kundera and "the novel" sitting in a paper object produced from a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. Like good love stories, it pulls you in.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.